Showing posts with label Sneaker Pimps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sneaker Pimps. Show all posts

11/11/2015

Bloodsport - Sneaker Pimps

Track list:

1. Kiro Tv
2. Sick
3. Small Town Witch
4. Black Sheep
5. Loretta Young Silks
6. M'aidez
7. The Fuel
8. Bloodsport
9. Think Harder
10. Blue Movie
11. Grazes

Running time: 53 minutes
Released: 2002
This album I remember as being full of really vital songs. Great tunes, but not necessarily a great album. I always contrasted it with Splinter, which was a far more cohesive experience with good, but not so great, individual songs. I don't quite know whether the anger and fire I remember as fueling this record will still give me a kick these days, now I'm not so young anymore. 

The staccato opening to Kiro TV remains fresh in the memory, and the nasal, edgy tone to Chris Corner's voice really sets the track off. The chorus is better than the rest, it seems to climax, come together in a synergy greater than the sum of its parts. In the verse its functional but dull, but with the injection of a bit more life and an extra effort or two in the singing it lights up. Grubby underground club film scene, side orders of sleaze and a certain type of movie-influenced sexuality. The confluence of factors works, whilst never leaving me comfortable listening to it.

Midweek. Busy week. My only night here at home, after a day of isolation working from my front room. And I just watched the first episode of Ben Whishaw vehicle London Spy on iPlayer. The only option for a listen and this - as well as being next cab off the rank - is a good fit. Sick uses strings and a guitar loop in place of the club-like sounds in places, a lighter touch to the music but not to themes. This is not happy positive stuff at all, but urgent and evocative. A sense of antipathy and misanthropy drips off every word, a feeling reinforced by the musical structures.

That restrained hate gives Bloodsport a vitality, an angst and a purpose that I really like in my music. It isn't screaming rage, its contained, let out with control to create something. Its a positive expression, harnessing negative emotion for effect. Whether deliberate, or just something I am inferring from the strain in his voice and the dominant tones in the construction I couldn't say, but I remember having this exact same reaction back when I first heard these songs, and having the same positive opinion of the disc. The guitar wobble in the hook of Black Sheep adds a sense of loneliness to the track, even as layering of the vocal builds a sense of a wider world. It strikes me as a very effective combination for the song, isolating and ostracizing. I really couldn't have stumbled onto a more appropriate album to listen to this evening all told. The song itself is one I remember liking but despite liking the effect outlined above, I find it a little flat as a piece of music tonight.

There are electronic beeps ending one track and making a seamless transition into Loretta Young Silks, which actually has a rather off-putting vocal staccato effect I don't remember. Once the song proper starts that fades away, thankfully, and its a head-noddy nothingness. Until, that is, the chorus hits. Like Kiro TV before it, the chorus just injects a sense of hurt, of being wronged, of disdain, into both the music and the vocal that the song takes off. The three choruses are certainly enough to drag the track up to a point where I would consider it the high point so far.

There is a significant shift in tone then. M'Aidez is a strained vocal, but the musical theme is much, much lighter, floating. There is still a darkness lurking there, but it has the impression of being to this album what How Do is to Becoming X. I suppose it works to cleanse the aural palette but I am not sure it is needed and as it goes on I am getting more and more thrown out of the appreciative mood that I was in at the end of the prior track. Thankfully it is a minor misstep; The Fuel is pure energy. The tension comes back in the second it starts, but it takes until the rhythm really establishes for it to generate the pure driving momentum I remember the track for. I see visuals of someone forcibly walking through crowds on dark, rain-swept back streets, fighting past exposed metalwork, dudes twice their size and dangerous ladies with far too many piercings. Always moving, always bobbing. I don't see it as vehicular movement, but constant personal flow. It's really hard to sit still and type with that bass. I really like this track in case you hadn't worked that out, despite never having been into the club scene, and particularly not the kind of club scene I imagine when I hear these kind of tunes.

The title track bleeds off the excess movement. Whilst still tense it is much more introspective and almost soft by comparison despite the heartache of the lyrics. "Love is just a blood sport" is a pretty epic level of cynicism that I used to share. Now I just feel too far removed from the sentiment in anything other than a familial sense to comment - I am far less bitter about this than I was when I was in my 20s. The track is catchy enough but at five and a half minutes it feels like it drags on a bit too far, so I am happy when we tick over to Think Harder. This track has the pace and energy of The Fuel, harnessed differently. It's less tense, less pent up, more act of release, the solution not the question, and - ironically - act, don't think. The image it generates is more of a chase, making snap decisions to escape. The cognitive dissonance between the image I get from the music and the content of the chorus lyric is a minor barrier, and does not impede my enjoyment of the tune.

It comes to a rather abrupt stop though and the last couple of tracks are less energetic. The sense of misanthropy returns with Blue Movie, which makes me picture a broken society living in run down neighbourhoods rather than anything even remotely sexy despite the obvious pornography references in title and lyrics. The whole piece falls flat for me, and there I must refrain from making poor taste jokes given the lyrical content. Why Amazon, from whence I pulled the track list, had the last track as "Crazes" not "Grazes" I don't know, but such things are easily corrected. This track I like despite it not having the urgency, the energy or the power of the higher tempo tracks. There is still a spirit of injustice and an air of hurt in the vocal, but the music is lighter. It remains grounded where M'Aidez floated a bit too much, a solid central structure and return to less open lines forgiving the somewhat overwrought soaring in the vocal come the chorus. I had forgotten the sonic discomfort that followed the first chorus, but it serves to offset the looseness in the long syllables and held notes. Its the simple but catchy percussion that sells the track though - strong enough to come through and create the structure, but light enough not to dominate the parts laid over it.

Overall? It's not quite the string of stellar tunes that I perhaps considered it a decade ago, but I still really like parts of it. They feel appropriate, they engender strong responses. The weak points are less forgivable than they were, and I still reckon it isn't a patch on Splinter, but it will be years before I get to cover that on this project and who knows... by then I'll probably have forgotten the whole bloody disc or only like Country or something. There is no such thing as a fair comparison in this space.

12/07/2015

The Best Kept Secrets: The Best of Lamb 1996-2004 - Lamb

Track list:

1. Cotton Wool
2. God Bless
3. Gold
4. Gorecki
5. Little Things
6. B Line
7. Lullaby
8. Bonfire
9. Heaven
10. One
11. Gabriel
12. Angelica
13. Til The Clouds Clear
14. Wonder
15. Please
16. Stronger

Running time: 71 minutes
Released: 2004
Lamb. Not sure why I have this... probably led to it via other "trip-hoppy" groups. Lamb were never a group I was abreast of when they were current and I have never really listened to this after acquiring it so whilst I have a reasonable idea of what sort of thing this disc contains, I am far from familiar with any of its contents. Depressingly it runs to over an hour, which means it is probably too long since my last post. If not, consider this more evidence of how I prepare the content for this backwater.

...

I wrote the paragraph above as I was setting up this post, immediately on finishing the last one.I predicted a long gap but even I didn't expect a whole month. June was a disaster of small things mounting up, and the early part of July has been dominated by recovering from finally sorting those things out. Hopefully I can establish some kind of rhythm again, though with the Ashes on radio to dominate my listening and a frankly poor run of things to get through before the interesting albums start again I have a degree of self-doubt there. Anyway, enough babbling and whinging, get on with it Graham!

We start with a dingy hook and a light vocal piercing the darkly reverberating space it leaves. I know none of these tracks, so this is a voyage of discovery as well as an attempt to kickstart the stalled project. Structure of electronically produced percussion is added, but the vocal is left to carry the tune on its own for the most part. It's a very odd introduction but not unwelcome. There is something trance-inducing about the percussive edge and darkly swirling sounds melded with it. Not brilliant or inspired, just a bit different and interesting in a way that, say Tricky's Angels With Dirty Faces was not for me. It loses my interest at the end of Cotton Wool by adding fairground-like pipes; ugh. I think the thing this most reminds me of, as God Bless begins, is the tracks that Sinead O'Connor recorded with Massive Attack on 100th Window. Whilst I would not say anything here is as accomplished as Massive Attack at their best, they probably do provide the best touchstone. Lamb are a little more pared back and stripped down though.

My feeling is that these two opening tracks have both been a little too long for their own good, and a glance at the player confirms they are both 5+ minutes, giving plenty of time to get a bit stale despite having reasonably solid core themes and ideas. I particularly like the vocal, much lighter than I was expecting, soft edges rather than a harder tone, and this contrasts the often very stark backing. These tracks are crafted to showcase the vocal component in places and do so effectively. I am not completely sold on the composition and arrangements yet.

Gold continues the trend of being just too long and - frankly - a bit too samey. Now we hit Gorecki, which a quick search indicates is their "signature". Backing of softly applied strings creates a crucible for the singing early on, overworked percussion joining to smear the contrast later. The piece does not work for me... too similar, nothing standing out, same faults at the prior tracks. I feel like I am still on the start line with this listen. The main problem is that whilst the sparse arrangements were interesting up front, there really isn't any long term engagement there, I can find more interesting programming elsewhere. I will say I love the singing but other than that? Patience wearing thin. At least the tracks get a bit shorter from here... hopefully punchier and more memorable too.

Ah, Little Things is familiar - more urgent, a more understandable percussive form to it. Fast, immediate and grungy. As a mood piece, very nice threat and edge to it. Not a comfortable listen but all the better for that. The central section, which drops the voice, is a little bland but without it the skittishness would not be quite the same. The jump into B Line is ugly - the start of the new piece really leaving a lot to be desired and just when I thought it might be getting better it devolves into a sonic mess, a pattern that unfortunately repeats again within the same track.

So far this is not creating a positive impression; I am left with the thought that if this is their best of then what was the main corpus of their work like?!

Lullaby is braver, better. Stepping away from mediocre beats that override as much or more than they support. Instead we have the voice sitting in a well of orchestral strings, the singing bringing the darkness along with a hint of bass line. Maybe this marks a swing in the pieces, as Bonfire seems to be a step in a similar direction, a slight dissonance with the echoing vocal, twice recorded, and atmosphere and tension building. Strings and piano taking over the accompaniment from clicks, whirrs and beats. My complaint, because I have to have one, is that lyrically it is rubbish, losing a lot of the impression that the voice makes to inanity. Shame really, I can see so much that is right in here, but the results seem to be dominated by the bits that are wrong.

I am only half way through. My stamina for this is waning - I have not sat at these keys trying to concertedly type for this long in a while... other than writing up my ongoing Albion game when sessions happen, but that has been as affected by recent events as this blog - not having the mental energy to approach writing up the material amidst a need to keel over after getting in the door. I digress because it feels like Lamb have, too. Heaven sounds like it should have been done by someone else - too light, too floaty - it does not fit with what has been, and does not address my problems with what I have been hearing.

The dark tone comes back with One, and is welcome. I have a fondness for slightly grubby sounds that evoke shady back alley deals, conflicts barely held back and danger in every shadow. I think it appeals to the gamer in me as the dirty darkness is pregnant with potential drama. Alas I am not convinced that there is enough to this to make good use of those themes. Just a little too... repetitive? Maybe. Too derivative? Well what isn't? Hard to put my finger on it. Gabriel, like Heaven ditches that tone and as a result sounds like a thousand and one other songs that I cannot name and have no desire to listen to again. Bland, not bad, everything it does done better somewhere else by someone else.

Is this best of really that bad? Probably not. I think in other circumstances, perhaps in the context of the original albums, I might have had a more positive response to Lamb. Angelica sounds awfully familiar... must be the Debussy sample that has been used elsewhere. Actually I think this track really works, uses the sample well.

The tone definitely seems to have shifted. In place of the darkness and electronica now we have light acoustic ballads? OK then. Musically it is plodding, unpromising to start, but interesting when the thrusting percussion appears unexpectedly... the only constant seems to be the pleasant singing voice. Veering from bland and boring to over-stimulation would work better for me if the two poles were placed slightly closer together. Contrast is good, but this feels more like a bait and switch than a coherent whole.

Wonder reminds me of How Do from Becoming X, so similar is the structure, the lightness and indeed the contrast with most of the rest of the album the song is being consumed with. Its not as good as the Sneaker Pimps track to my mind, and I really don't need both of them. Wonder just feels a little bland somehow.

I am glad to be winding down this listen, less glad to have had my fears for it be proved true. A couple of tracks will be held on to but the majority are for the bin. I really must sort out a better writing position if I am going to keep going with this (and that is still the plan, despite the long hiatus) as my back is aching an hour into this listen. I don't know what to do about that because it's just so convenient having a laptop on my coffee table for general use.

As for the remaining tracks... Please is just dull, bland. Stronger, which will end this post starts promisingly but ultimately does not grow as it could. The electro-funk bass which kicks in for the final third feels like it has warped in from a completely different genre but does at least bring a little more depth and so, maybe, just rescues the song from the precipice of disappointment.

Overall? Yeah, this does not do it for me. Couple of highlights, but mostly chaff. I found the transition in style over the course of the album interesting, suggesting that tracks were arranged chronologically to some degree, and there were good points - be they specific ideas, good use of vocal or whatever - scattered around the various tracks. Overall, though, it just lacks something intangible, never quite up to enough to make it stand out or to raise Lamb to the bar set by their contemporaries or genre neighbours.

13/03/2015

Becoming X - Sneaker Pimps

Track list:

1. Low Place Like Home
2. Tesko Suicide
3. 6 Underground
4. Becoming X
5. Spin Spin Sugar
6. Post-Modern Sleaze
7. Waterbaby
8. Roll On
9. Wasted Early Sunday Morning
10. Walking Zero
11. How Do

Running time: 46 minutes
Released: 1996
Going back 20 years again now. I remember when 6 Underground and Spin Spin Sugar were released as singles and not liking either. We change with time I guess, because I got into them later. This album, although it is the one with the songs everyone remembers, is probably the weakest of the three I have (Splinter and Bloodsport are the others). A grubby overtone to this permeates the later efforts, too, but here there the female vocal dilutes it a little compared with Chris Corner's later on. And to be clear I think that grubbiness is welcome here.

It starts right on the money with Low Place Like Home where the loop sets the tone with a ramshackle edge to it, the percussion sounding almost improvised, dulled. The choruses, when they come, inject an edgy guitar and the effect is atmospheric. It is background music, really - better experienced as the soundtrack to some other activity as the loops and hooks lull you into a head nod that feels like it should be in a dark and murky club. This sets the tone for the whole album really - on edge somewhat, seedy, rhythmic.

Friday night and I am doing this; too old now for the "going out" - not that I was ever much of one for that. Relevance? Well I never really hear music like this in the context it was created for - but that's fine; it has a life outside of that context. 6 Underground is a little more melodic, with a softer backing. The loops are there but there are more expansive themes there - an effect of space outside the walls created by the hook. I don't really know why I didn't like this originally... there's nothing to dislike. It is not a masterwork though, actually hearing it back now it sounds a little bland, a bit too radio friendly. The song lacks the grit and grime and it removes the most effective ingredient from the composition. This makes it accessible and pleasant - inoffensive.

Not that the dirtier, darker tracks are offensive at all, but its that slightly seedy atmosphere that makes this music tick, drawing you in and wrapping its tendrils around you. There is an urgency, a desperation, to Spin Spin Sugar. This song stands out from the others to date for that... it is the first time where the vocal really sets off the track behind it and sparks a synergy, the sort of seductive mix that sparks a purchase. I think the tracks generally stand up OK, even when it goes more expansive and away from the inglorious undertones that make the biggest impact.

Waterbaby starts to drift a bit - it has the right tone, but the more ethereal vocal and simple instrumentation over the loops are a bit too empty to have much punch and my attention wavers. Suffice to say that Mastermind is not very interesting on mute! My attention strays further with Roll On - I have a problem with songs like this that use adult imagery (IYKWIMAITYD) in lyrics in that I find it impossible to take seriously and dismiss the entire composition as a bit of a joke as a result. Its a shame because actually here the lyrics actually work with the theme of the album, encapsulating that seediness I keep banging on about, but to be honest the track then loses me totally in its outro as it builds a bigger sound which is a little bit of a mess.

Into the climb-down now and I have to admit that I cannot bring Walking Zero to mind at all before it starts. Every other tune here I have had some kind of aural imprint confirmed (or dismissed) by the play, but that one I am staring at blankly as the singer whitters on about Sunday morning drop outs. This album really is the poor relation to its follow-ups - less of a complete end-to-end album than Splinter (which I would flag as my favourite), and not as many stand out tracks as Bloodsport, which may have the best songs. Actually, the holding up is more marginal after the second half - which suffers from coming after the apogee and not doing well in direct comparison. Fair to say that drifting away is quite commonplace over these last few tracks.

How Do is an interesting closer, though. It ditches all the dirt, climbs up and takes flight - a much more melodic, floaty song. It could have come from an entirely different record but it stands out and works for that reason. There is a nice build and the rise and fall of the melody work really well with the lighter touch in the singing to create an open soundscape. To the point where the electronic loops and hooks that were making the atmosphere earlier on in the album are really out of place here, and actually detract. I don't ever recall being so overwhelmed by them before to the point of them spoiling the song for me but this time, perhaps as I am actually paying attention, they are just a little distracting.

So what to do then? Part of me wants to strip these right back and keep just the highlights - part of me says keep the whole lot because whilst I tuned out a little in the middle there it has always been a tone I come back to this for not the specific tracks. On balance, I don't need chaff, and I have the tone elsewhere so time to wield the scythe.